logoMain
Instagram Linkedin Youtube Dribbble Behance

How We Reduced Cart Abandonment by 40% for an E-commerce

A smartphone and laptop on a wooden desk displaying a clean, green and white e-commerce checkout interface. The screens show a progress bar, payment details, an order summary, and a prominent green button to place the order.

Cart abandonment isn't a pricing problem. It's a design problem.

Most e-commerce brands look at their abandonment numbers and immediately reach for discounts, retargeting ads, or abandoned cart emails. These things help at the margins. But in nearly every project we have worked on at Feelpixel, the real reason customers leave is far simpler and far more fixable: the checkout experience itself is getting in their way.
Something breaks their confidence. Something asks too much of them. Something makes them pause just long enough to close the tab.
These aren’t pricing objections. They’re design failures. And the good news is that design failures can be fixed.

In this blog, we are walking you through the exact thinking and interventions that helped us reduce cart abandonment by 40% for an e-commerce brand and why the same principles apply across every category we have worked in, from automotive to healthcare to fast fashion.

The scale of the problem is larger than most brands realise.
Research from the Baymard Institute shows that the average online shopping cart abandonment rate is 70.19%, meaning nearly 7 out of 10 shoppers who add products to their cart never complete the purchase.
What’s even more interesting is why they leave. The biggest reasons aren’t always related to pricing or product quality. Instead, shoppers frequently abandon checkout because the experience creates unnecessary friction. Baymard’s research found that 24% of users abandoned their purchase because they were required to create an account, while 17% left because the checkout process felt too long or complicated.
These findings point to an important reality: many abandoned carts are not lost because customers changed their minds. They are lost because the buying experience created hesitation at the moment users were ready to convert.
Statista has estimated that $4.6 trillion worth of merchandise is left in abandoned carts globally every year, with around 63% of that potentially recoverable through better design and UX.
That number is almost impossible to fully absorb, but at a brand level it translates into something very concrete: a large portion of the revenue you are already paying to acquire is walking out the door because the checkout is not good enough.

Why most checkout experiences fail users at the worst possible moment

The core issue is that most checkout flows are built to be functional, not to be human.
  • Developers build them to satisfy business requirements: collect the address, collect payment, confirm the order. The user’s emotional state during that process, their anxiety about security, their confusion over form errors, their frustration at being forced to create a password just to buy a pair of sneakers, none of that makes it into the technical spec. So what you end up with is a checkout that technically works but practically leaks.
  • There is friction at every step: Too many fields to fill, no real-time error feedback, confusing field labels, no clear indication of how many steps are left. Each small friction point reduces buying intent just a little, and by the time the user reaches the payment screen, the accumulated frustration is enough to tip them toward abandoning.
  • Trust signals are missing or poorly placed: Users are being asked to hand over their card details to a brand they may have found that morning via an Instagram ad. At that moment they need reassurance, a security badge, a clear return policy, a review or two from someone who actually received the product. Instead, most checkouts bury this information or leave it out entirely.
  • The mobile experience has not been properly designed: Over 60% of e-commerce traffic now comes from mobile devices, according to Statista. Yet most checkout flows were designed on desktop and then squeezed onto smaller screens rather than properly reimagined for how people actually shop on their phones. The result is tiny tap targets, keyboards that cover input fields, and CTAs that fall below the fold.
  •  

And there is almost never a recovery moment. Brands spend heavily on acquisition but invest almost nothing in the design of what happens when a user shows signs of leaving the checkout.

There is no graceful save point, no reassurance, no moment that says:

“You were almost there, and it’s worth finishing.”

How we approach this at Feelpixel

We treat cart abandonment as a design systems problem, not a marketing problem. That framing matters because it changes what you look at, what you fix, and how you measure success.

Start by finding where users actually leave

Before we touch a single screen, we want to understand exactly where in the checkout flow abandonment is happening and why.
This means running a proper audit: reviewing session recordings through tools like Hotjar or FullStory, mapping the funnel data to find the step with the sharpest drop-off, evaluating the experience against Baymard Institute’s 244+ checkout usability guidelines, and comparing it to what category leaders are doing right.

In almost every project we have worked on, the majority of abandonment traces back to one or two specific moments in the flow. When you know which moments those are, you stop guessing and start fixing the right things. That alone accelerates results significantly.

Make the checkout feel effortless

Once we know where users are dropping off, the most impactful work is almost always simplification.

The goal is to reduce the number of decisions and the amount of effort required to complete the purchase.

  • Guest checkout should be the default and the hero of the page. Forcing users to create an account before they can buy is one of the single biggest abandonment drivers in e-commerce. Making guest checkout prominent and moving account creation to an optional post-purchase step, routinely lifts completion rates by 25 to 30% on its own.
  • Inline validation matters more than most teams realise. When a user fills in a form field incorrectly, they should know about it the moment they move to the next field, not when they hit submit and the whole page reloads with a list of errors.
  • The Nielsen Norman Group’s research shows that inline validation can improve form completion rates by up to 22%. That is a meaningful lift from a single UX change.
  • Progress indicators reduce checkout anxiety. When users can see that they are on step 2 or 3, they are far more likely to push through than if they feel like the checkout might go on forever. Showing people where they are gives them a sense of control and a visible finish line.
  • Smart defaults and auto-fill reduce the perceived effort of buying. Address auto-complete, saved payment methods, and auto-detected country and currency all make the checkout feel like it is working with the user rather than demanding things from them.

Build trust at the exact moment it matters most

Trust is the most underrated conversion lever in e-commerce, and nowhere does it matter more than at the payment step.

The user is being asked to hand over financial information to a brand they may have only just discovered. Any flicker of doubt at that moment can end the transaction.

We place security badges and SSL indicators close to the payment form, not in the footer where no one looks.

Return policy information has to be visible and scannable without the user having to hunt for it. If there are customer reviews available, some of them should be visible during checkout, not just on the product page. And a money-back guarantee or free returns callout near the CTA button does a quiet but powerful job of reducing purchase anxiety.

According to Baymard Institute ,17% of users who abandon checkout say they did not trust the site with their credit card information. That is not a small group. Trust design is a core part of conversion, not a decorative afterthought.

Design mobile checkout as its own experience

At Feelpixel , we design mobile first on every e-commerce project. Not mobile responsive mobile first. The mobile checkout is designed from scratch for how people actually use their phones, and then the desktop version is adapted from that. Most teams do the opposite, and it shows.

Designing for mobile properly means thinking carefully about tap target sizes so users can select fields and options without zooming in. It means the order summary should be collapsible so it does not push the buy button below the fold. It means input fields should trigger the right keyboard type so that phone number fields open a numeric keypad instead of a full keyboard. And the CTA should stay sticky at the bottom of the screen so the user always has a clear path forward without scrolling.

Mobile commerce accounted for 60% of global e-commerce sales in 2025, per Statista. Designing checkout for desktop first is not a conservative choice, it is an expensive one.

Design what happens when someone is about to leave

  • The checkout experience does not end at the payment form. We also design what happens in the moments when users are showing signs of leaving, when their mouse drifts toward the back button, when they have been inactive for a while, or when they start scrolling upward.
  • An exit intent message does not need to offer a discount. Often the most effective message is simply: “Your cart is saved. You can come back anytime.” That small reassurance removes one of the silent reasons people abandon, the belief that they will have to start over if they leave.
  • Persistent carts across sessions make sure returning users do not lose their progress. And if the user has already entered their email address, a well-designed cart recovery email sequence can bring a meaningful percentage of them back to complete the purchase.

The work we have done across e-commerce

Cart abandonment looks different in every category. A user buying medication has different anxieties than a user buying a car part or a fashion item.
The emotional stakes, the trust requirements, and the decision complexity all shift depending on what is being sold.

This is something we have learned across years of working with brands in very different spaces.

For CARS24’s new car buying experience , the challenge was that purchasing a car online is one of the highest-consideration transactions a person can make. Simplifying the checkout was necessary, but not sufficient. The entire funnel needed to build enough trust and confidence to make users comfortable completing a significant financial decision on a digital platform.
With Bestless, the context was entirely different. Fast fashion runs on impulse. The window between a user discovering a product and wanting to buy it is short, and any friction in that window kills the momentum. The work here was about compressing the path to purchase and making mobile checkout feel instant.
Auction Bazaar brought a B2B complexity that most checkout frameworks are not built to handle. B2B buyers have longer decision cycles, may involve multiple approvers, and often mix high-value one-time purchases with frequent repeat orders. The redesign had to serve both types of buying behaviour without creating a confusing experience for either.
Medlife is a healthcare e-commerce context where trust and accuracy are not just conversion drivers — they are safety requirements. Users buying medications online need to be absolutely certain they are getting the right product. The checkout design had to reinforce that certainty at every step while still being fast and frictionless.
Our work with Amazon India showed that even at massive scale, there are drop-off points baked into the product page and purchase flow that most teams have stopped noticing because they have become familiar. Fresh eyes on a familiar flow often surface the most valuable improvements.
And with Parts Pitara, the primary challenge was compatibility and confidence. When someone is buying an auto part online, their biggest fear is ordering the wrong thing. The product and checkout experience had to give users clear confirmation that the part they were looking at would fit their specific vehicle before they were willing to add it to their cart.

Each of these projects reinforced the same underlying truth. Cart abandonment is a symptom.

The cause is almost always a gap in trust, clarity, or ease at a specific point in the user journey, and it is findable and fixable when you look for it properly.

What the results look like

Here is a summary of outcomes across Feelpixel e-commerce engagements:

Metric Before After Change
Cart Abandonment Rate ~68% ~41% 40% reduction
Checkout Completion Rate 32% 51% 59% improvement
Mobile Conversion Rate 1.4% 2.6% 85% lift
Bounce Rate on Checkout Page 44% 28% 36% reduction
Average Session Duration 2m 14s 3m 42s 65% increase

Results are aggregated across multiple Feelpixel e-commerce projects. Specific outcomes vary by brand, category, and starting baseline.

What the best checkout experiences actually have in common

  • Brands that convert well are not doing something magical. They are just doing a small number of things consistently and correctly.
  • They reduce the number of decisions the user has to make. Every unnecessary field, every optional but displayed step, every moment where the user has to figure out what to do next is a conversion risk. The best checkouts feel like they are helping the user through the process rather than collecting information from them.
  • They surface the right trust signal at the right moment. A security badge near the payment field. A return policy near the CTA. A review near the product summary. These things only work when they appear at the moment the user needs reassurance, not buried in a footer or presented in a block of legal text.
  • They treat mobile as the primary experience. Not an adaptation. Not a scaled-down version of desktop. A genuinely designed experience for someone using their phone with one hand, probably while doing something else.
  • They design for recovery as well as for completion. Not every user will convert on the first attempt. The brands that do best have thought carefully about what happens when someone leaves and have made it easy and low-friction for them to come back.
  • These are not trends. They are the practical application of how people actually behave when they are in the middle of making a purchase decision.

What a client said

“Our vision to transform the used car industry by using technology as a backbone of it. We wanted to solve genuine pain points that has never been solved before in this industry. I am really glad that Feelpixel got on board. They’ve been working with us for 8-9 months. They really helped us think through our users much more deeply. I am really happy with the outcome we have got so far.”

— Gajendra Jangid

Co-Founder & Chief Starmarketer, CARS24

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a reasonable cart abandonment rate to aim for?
The industry average sits around 70%, so if you are close to that, you are not alone, but you are also leaving a lot of revenue on the table. Most well-optimised checkout flows land in the 45 to 55% abandonment range. Brands in high-consideration categories like automotive or healthcare will naturally trend higher, but even in those spaces, good UX moves the needle meaningfully.
Baymard Institute research consistently surfaces a short list: unexpected costs at checkout, being forced to create an account, a checkout that feels too long or complicated, not trusting the site with payment information, and not being able to see the full order total before committing. The pattern across all of these is that they are UX problems with UX solutions.
A focused audit and redesign of a checkout flow usually takes four to eight weeks from discovery to handoff. More complex projects involving mobile apps, web, and third-party payment integrations can run ten to sixteen weeks. Feelpixel works in iterative sprints, which means improvements often go live before the full engagement is complete.
It consistently produces some of the largest lifts we see in any project. Mobile users make up the majority of e-commerce traffic in most categories, but mobile conversion rates tend to lag significantly behind desktop. That gap almost always reflects a mobile experience that was designed as an adaptation rather than as a purpose-built interface. Fixing that properly makes a real difference.
The core metrics we track are cart abandonment rate, checkout completion rate, payment success rate, and the gap between mobile and desktop conversion. For brands with enough traffic to support it, A/B testing lets us isolate the impact of individual changes. For smaller brands, we use before-and-after cohort analysis to understand what shifted and by how much.
If your abandonment rate is higher than you want it to be, the answer is almost certainly sitting somewhere in the checkout experience — a step that asks too much, a moment that lacks trust, a mobile flow that loses users before they reach payment.
Feelpixel works with e-commerce brands to find those moments and fix them properly. If you want to understand where your checkout is breaking down and what it would take to change that, reach out and let’s talk.

Feelpixel is a product design agency, building scalable digital experiences across e-commerce, SaaS, healthcare, and fintech.

Work with Feelpixel

Every abandoned cart tells a story. The challenge is uncovering where users hesitate and why they decide not to complete their purchase.

 

At Feelpixel, we help ecommerce brands reduce cart abandonment through UX research, checkout optimisation, customer journey mapping, and conversion-focused design. From identifying friction points to creating seamless, trust-building experiences, we design journeys that help more shoppers become customers.

Let’s shape the future of learning, one experience at a time

Book a Strategy Call →

share

Related blogs

Got a project in mind?

Partner with us